<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:56:40 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>On climate tinkers</title><description>Defending our air from climate tinkers</description><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>78</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-836936117415715316</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-22T11:43:50.714Z</atom:updated><title>Cohenite - Dismantling the Warming by CO2  Fantasy &amp;SF</title><atom:summary type='text'>This is from Cohenite earlier this year. It deserves repreating.

Unlike “Climate Change”, which is the new, deceitful term used by alarmists, AGW does conform to Popper’s falsification principle; Climate Change is not a scientific theory because it cannot be disproved; the climate is always changing and nothing disproves it. But AGW is promulgated on the basis of definite assumptions; these </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/12/cohenite-dismantling-warming-by-co2.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-2190111781603599193</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:49:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-23T23:51:31.373Z</atom:updated><title>Brown-Blair-UN-EU world government?  Vote BNP to kill the con?</title><atom:summary type='text'>Now the incredibly docile, incredulous public is slowly awakening to the reality that eulab is a part of the world gov-NWO project, Brown apparently going out of his way to guarantee a high ranking position by means of destroying the UK and aiding the destruction of democracy, making sure there is no money left in the public purse to aid a recovery, here is the picture for the very near future.

</atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/12/brown-blair-un-eu-world-government-vote.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-8350424639692756668</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-18T02:21:25.680Z</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>no sex here</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Environmentalism is Facism</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>enslavement</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>UN ecofcists</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Gore</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>AGW</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>climate change</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>climate change con</category><title>The Environmentals' Progress</title><atom:summary type='text'>This is a list of the excellent articles and reviews in the 'Environmentalism is Facism' series.

Articles

The American Oligarchy's Economic Warfare Campaign on British Columbians
(2000)
UPDATE SEE BELOW

The Great Global Warming Hoax
(2000)

The English Environmental Elite, Global Warming, and The Anglican Church
(2000)

The Groundbreaking Career of Doctor Science
(2000)

The Gore Presidential </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/12/environmentals-progress.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-5210473354914989873</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-21T15:16:14.949Z</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Miliband</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Mandleson</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>commie con artistes</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Barroso</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Pachauri</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Gore</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Clinton</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Darling</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Obama</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>eulab</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Naziism</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Brown</category><title>Climategate &amp; That Was The Month That Was &amp; Vindication &amp; A Book &amp; News</title><atom:summary type='text'>Confirmation Of The Dependence Of The ERA-40 Reanalysis Data On The Warm Bias In The CRU Data 
UPDATE: I was asked to clarify the importance of this post.
The reason that it is important to document the link of ERA-40 to the warm bias in CRU (and thus NCDC and GISS data sets) is that the ERA-40 paper is used to make claims about global and regional warming (with the inference that this is an </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/12/climategate-that-was-month-that-was.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-9186218545302306430</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-01T15:27:51.155+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>hockey stick</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>briffa</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>mcintyre</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>yamal</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>mckitrick</category><title>Will the IPCC resign?</title><atom:summary type='text'>The data for the Briffa et al. version of the hockey stick looks to have been selected to support the IPCC position. This follows a pattern.
Dr. Hansen, GISS leader adjusts their temperature records constantly, disproportionately favouring warming. 
NOAA has been accused of omitting unsupportive data. 
Both venues are favoured by the IPCC. 
Now the Hadley CRU, another IPCC favoured org is under </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/10/will-ipcc-resign.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-3590561644435198041</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-13T10:10:51.554+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Mandleson</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>club of rome</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Strong</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Gore</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>AGW</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>climate change</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>UN scam</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Brown</category><title>Brown Rot, Gorebull, Gang Green</title><atom:summary type='text'>A nation deceived. No wonder Brown chews his digits. Deception is a big cause of stress. “But it is the awareness itself that will drive the change and one of the ways it will drive the change is through global governance and global agreements.” (Editor's Note: Gore makes the “global governance” comment at the 1min. 10 sec. mark in this UK Times video.).  (Source)Gore is a club of rome member and</atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/07/brown-rot-gorebull-gang-green.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-3450724347901975199</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-04T19:37:16.632+01:00</atom:updated><title>Royal Commission necessary</title><atom:summary type='text'>I'm making myself tired for nothing.Top Aussie scientists have proposed a Royal Commission may be the answer to determining the veracity of IPCC opinions on carbon dioxide poisoning the climate. "Parliament should defer consideration of the CPRS bill and institute a fully independent Royal Commission of enquiry into the evidence for and against a dangerous human influence on climate." Read and </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/07/royal-commission-necessary.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-3026275676994950407</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-04T15:42:05.389+01:00</atom:updated><title>Australian Senator Responded 3</title><atom:summary type='text'>Question 3 Is it the case that all GCM computer models projected a steady increase in temperature for the period 1990-2008, whereas in fact there were only 8 years of warming were(sic) followed by 10 years of stasis and cooling.Correct answer - Yes If so, why is it assumed that long-term climate projections by the same models are suitable as a basis for public policy making?Correct answer - Bad </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/07/australian-senator-responded-2_03.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-2151648611613762184</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-03T12:27:11.107+01:00</atom:updated><title>Australian Senator Responded 2</title><atom:summary type='text'>Re. Response to Q2.Question 2 Is it the case that the rate and magnitude of warming between 1979 and 1998 (the late 20th century phase of global warming) was not unusual in either rate or magnitude as compared with warmings that have occurred earlier in the Earth's history?Correct answer - Yes. While the Earth's temperature has been warmer in the geological past than it is today, the magnitude </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/07/australian-senator-responded-2.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-7183250742695073335</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-03T12:03:47.475+01:00</atom:updated><title>Australian Senator Responded 1</title><atom:summary type='text'>Response to Senator Fielding's questions about the climate change science (PDF - 91 KB)Re. response to 3 questions. Q1  Wednesday, July  1, 2009, 12:15 PM GMT [Environmental Science]    A sceptic's point of view.  Question 1: Is it the case that CO2  increased by 5% since 1998 whilst global temperature cooled over the same  period? Correct answer - yes.  If so, why did the  temperature not </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/07/australian-senator-responded-1.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-3496211002813569316</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-27T11:13:17.203+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Prime Minister's Question Time</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>politics</category><title>Mr. MP it's as easy as 1 2 3</title><atom:summary type='text'>QUESTION 1.Is it the case that CO2 increased by 5% since 1998 whilst global temperature cooled over the same period (see Fig. 1)?If so, why did the temperature not increase; and how can human emissions be to blame for dangerous levels of warming?QUESTION 2.Is it the case that the rate and magnitude of warming between 1979 and 1998 (the late 20th century phase of global warming) was not unusual in</atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/06/mr-mp-its-as-easy-as-1-2-3.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9u0EhYOynGg/SkXrt-erHNI/AAAAAAAAAXI/EXnLPz9m0vg/s72-c/FieldingQuestions_Page_2_Image_0001.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-6271600999554362369</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-09T15:24:00.833+01:00</atom:updated><title>I'm dreamin' of a white summer...</title><atom:summary type='text'>CO2 drives warming?????Temperature cooled - warmed - cooled - warmed - cooling.CO2 increased - increased - increased - increased - increasing.Guesstimate of US  temperatures by the USHCN (US Hysterical Historical Climate Network, AGW advocacy org)Image from http://icecap.us/images/uploads/USHCNvsCO2.jpgAbove is temperatures, all the following are temperature differences from an arbitrary </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/06/im-dreamin-of-white-summer.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-4870449558381208939</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-06T09:10:34.978+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>dissolving coral</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Acid oceans</category><title>Earth's Incredible Dissolving Corals</title><atom:summary type='text'>In a paper recently published in Geophysical Research Letters, Silverman et al. (2009) created a model of coral calcification based on field observations of gross community calcification as a function of aragonite saturation state (Ωarag), sea surface temperature (SST) and live coral cover, after which they calculated calcification rates for more than 9,000 reef locations using model values of </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/06/earths-incredible-dissolving-corals.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-6894434507592582216</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-04T11:36:11.421+01:00</atom:updated><title>Third International Conference on Climate Change</title><atom:summary type='text'>NewsFrom here:http://www.heartland.org/events/WashingtonDC09/news.htmlWelcome to the press room for the Third International Conference on Climate Change, June 2, 2009 in Washington, DC. The theme of the conference is: “Scientific Debate and Economic Analysis.”If you are a journalist seeking more information about the conference, speakers or co-sponsors, please contact Dan Miller (dmiller@</atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/06/third-international-conference-on.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-1152665773786599857</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-03T08:39:39.424+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Richard Lindzen ICCC 2009</category><title>Richard Lindzen ICCC 2009</title><atom:summary type='text'></atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/06/blog-post.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-6298756212285888637</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-02T18:32:48.270+01:00</atom:updated><title>AGW has never been about science</title><atom:summary type='text'>  From: politicsofclimatechange.wordpress.comTo comment please go to the original article at the above URL.The battle over global warming and low-carbon policies will not be decided over scientific issues. It will be determined by governments and law-makers on the basis of hard-nosed national and economic interests. This is where the green utopia for a low-carbon transition in the near future is </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/06/agw-has-never-been-about-science.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-3853349893397460255</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-30T13:33:15.716+01:00</atom:updated><title>Panacea for greenism?</title><atom:summary type='text'> No such thing but there is an instrument that causes the green agenda proselytizers and profiteers to tremble. Cost-benefit analysis. Had it been used for wind farms, they would still be a mirage. Biofuel would never have been unleashed to cause the very real harm it has managed to achieve to date and biased climate research would still be a tool of scientists rather than politicians, profiteers</atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/05/panacea-for-greenism.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-9161470790724030695</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-27T10:30:11.338+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>club of rome</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>million child deaths</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>malaria</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>world health BS</category><title>WHO - health or CoR population control</title><atom:summary type='text'>Talk about making a killing. How these people use our money. To call it a health org is an oxymoron. They are taking our money and using it to fund their own (Club of Rome population control?) agenda and it is far from being about "health". Stop funding this immoral org.The following article was copied from the Green Hell web site. To comment please visit:http://greenhellblog.wordpress.com/A dead</atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/05/talk-about-making-killing.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_9u0EhYOynGg/Sh0GX1-U8kI/AAAAAAAAAUI/a8IMorkAJGo/s72-c/childmalaria1.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-3852649703616344060</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-25T23:27:46.748+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>AGW theory dismissal</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>NI Climate Change Committee</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Hans Schreuder</category><title>AGW theory settled by science</title><atom:summary type='text'>Decimation of the AGW theory.Press release 0900 - Friday 22 May 2009 - without embargo refers.Hans SchreuderEast Anglia, EnglandFrom NI_oral_evidence.pdfChairperson and members of the NI Climate Change Committee, greetings and thank you for inviting me to present my oral evidence today, which comprises mostly a number of short pertinent quotations from eminent scientists.Allow me though to first </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/05/agw-theory-settled-by-science.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9u0EhYOynGg/ShlWX5cKh_I/AAAAAAAAATw/tqBDyBfNFT8/s72-c/NI_oral_evidence_Page_1_Image_0001.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-2392995547447148267</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 11:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-25T23:30:48.705+01:00</atom:updated><title>CO2 drives warming. Politicians don't lie.</title><atom:summary type='text'>There is no evidence that CO2 is harmful to climate yet an abundance of evidence that it isn't. The people that benefit from CO2 being seen as harmful include certain modellers who assert they are climate experts, (status, funding) the IPCC, the EU, politicians, (power, status) green business, (money) financial organisations, (money) and environmentalist human haters such as Greenpeace (</atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/05/co2-drives-warming-politicians-dont-lie.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-5224497301397117565</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 10:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-14T11:20:12.321+01:00</atom:updated><title>Global Warming Global Cooling</title><atom:summary type='text'>Humans have a significant effect on insignificant additions to the atmospheric CO2 volume. It is generally accepted but unprovable that humans add ~30% of the 1 to 3 parts per million increase in atmospheric volume per year. Human carbon dioxide, (ACO2) is not discriminated against by nature. The IPCC tells us ~50% of ACO2 is absorbed by the various sinks, NAS told us in 2007 that 98.5% of all </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/05/global-warming-global-cooling.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-3816285932429352330</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-01T17:58:21.263+01:00</atom:updated><title>What is "climate change", why is (was) it perceived as a serious threat?</title><atom:summary type='text'>Climate change is a perception variable and its interpretation is equally so. To predict, it is necessary to have far more information than we now have and to understand it properly requires extensive knowledge in many scientific disciplines. Each discipline has its bias. Climate science is biased toward GHG warming, the majority finding blaming human emissions brings constant and generous </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/05/what-is-climate-change-why-is-was-it.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-744185894429986101</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-25T22:30:43.662+01:00</atom:updated><title>IPCC Kyoto's multi-trillion dollar question</title><atom:summary type='text'> The actual value of the climate sensitivity is a multi-trillion dollar question (the cost of implementing Kyoto related penalties). If it is high, it would imply that human emissions of greenhouse gases could significantly increase the global equilibrium temperature, while if it is small, the anthropogenic effect cannot be large, and any measures we take will not have a noticeable effect. Its </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/04/ipcc-kyotos-multi-trillion-dollar.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9u0EhYOynGg/SfGkAOI5CbI/AAAAAAAAAS4/G9zfa-Qoorc/s72-c/IPCCflyer.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-2668939762784590565</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-22T00:49:14.938+01:00</atom:updated><title>CO2 controlled by socialists?</title><atom:summary type='text'>CO2 regulated?The EPA endangerment finding on CO2 (Sindark)If uncontrolled activists have their way, yes.EPA Endangerment Finding Will Destroy Jobs, Harm Consumers (Sen. James Inhofe) (The Hill)The Great Government CO2 Power Grab (Wm. Briggs)Obama Begins Regulation of Carbon Dioxide (Jennifer Marohasy)CO2, EPA, Politics, and all that (WUWT)Making your opinion on CO2 and climate change known to </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/04/co2-controlled-by-socialists.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8662274991005939005.post-8430394072625895172</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-20T01:00:30.598+01:00</atom:updated><title>US of A, a third still believe the AGW dogma</title><atom:summary type='text'>Sceptical bloggers and scientists, you are not working hard enough.The disinformation put out by the IPCC, various "authoritative" organisations and the media that human emitted CO2 causes dangerous warming, (atmospheric CO2 is at present roughly 1 part in 3000 (0.038%), annual additions from all sources is less than 6 thousandths of that 1 part (0.00017% of the atm. recent years' average), the </atom:summary><link>http://co2didit.blogspot.com/2009/04/us-of-a-third-still-believe-agw-dogma.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Clothcap)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>