Brown-Blair-UN-EU world government? Vote BNP to kill the con?

Now the incredibly docile, incredulous public is slowly awakening to the reality that eulab is a part of the world gov-NWO project, Brown apparently going out of his way to guarantee a high ranking position by means of destroying the UK and aiding the destruction of democracy, making sure there is no money left in the public purse to aid a recovery, here is the picture for the very near future.

A planned return to serfdom for the masses. Badly educated, forced into at least energy poverty and for many, real poverty together with travel made too expensive, common  people have few ways to resist the overwhelming might of a military and a police militia formed from an amalgam of international forces under selected generals. Selected by a self appointed world government formed by the union of the UN and EU (EC). To achieve it money is needed. Not least because Germany and Britain's paltry billions are barely enough to maintain the superstructure, gold bathroom fittings, palaces and EU servant wages, payola, fraud and the ubiquitous expenses, let alone the junkets, it seems Obama has been recruited, there is circumstantial evidence that he supports a world gov. by the organisations he has associated himself with, by his support of the carbon indulgences scam and wind farms from which the EU must benefit mightily from their investment, at huge cost to the taxpayer with no perceptible benefit to either end users or the climate. 

A deliberately (?) spiralling national debt, ensuring poverty for generations, no gold reserve to fall back on, deliberate (?) inflation and devaluation of the £ and a preplanned (?) increase in unemployment by forcing business and industry abroad and by forcing companies out of business through taxation coupled with the swamping of the country with foreign workers and especially muslims with a proclivity for overburdening the social security system, geared to foster civil unrest in the UK. All in line with the green agenda.

Should a party that is against the new world order movement get into power, all debts incurred by (ab)use of the powers of (unelected) government by eulab should be transferred to the account of eulab and the EU. The British public should not be made to pay for the actions of the present incumbents that at no time have been the will or wish of the majority. Should the country be made bankrupt, the entire government AND the "stand back and applaud" opposition should face public trial.

If the EU doesn't outlaw an election, now that the UKIP appears to be bankrupt (the judiciary is owned) the choice is between the BNP and the EU (eulab or the Conservatives who seemingly intend for the transfer of European Union Costs us £65 Billion every year. European Union waste, fraud and corruption have cost us billions (60% more come 2010), UN and developing countries, and the destruction of democracy and the tattered remains of United Kingdom industry and commerce to continue). There is no choice. BNP is the lesser of two (3) evils.

This video may give some insight into my reasoning - Bill Whittle "The Kudzu Curse: A Fight for Free Enterprise" 25 min. at the Lincoln Club of San Diego Annual Banquet Keynote Speech 10 Dec 2009
If you understand, vote for BNP next election.

So how is the money to finance the advancement of the world gov project to be finessed from the US public?
As customary for anything connected with the EU/UN/NWO (which means Club of Rome* and offshoots, the foremost being Club of Madrid* and Club of Budapest*, also the Bilderbergs* and Illuminati* orgs that are in on the act in a big way by all accounts) duplicity is their first choice. Promise one thing, do another. Brown has it inherently as an artless skill. First choice, the con, carbon indulgences, (a tax on the gas of life and the source of our civilisation's advance). And donations to the world bank, ostensibly for the third world. If you believe that then no wonder we are so deep in the doo. The money will be paid to the bank. The 3rd world will be lucky to see a fraction else there will likely be an arrangement where the leaders take a bite (while officials go blind to where it ends up) and the rest is paid back to the bank which is then cash under their control. The EU appears to have a great deal of experience in this practice. 14 or is it 15 years and their accounts still not finalised, a lady who wanted to sort it was dismissed, the EC celebrated that as a success. [...] said to have been suspended from her job and ultimately fired because she refused to sign accounts she believed were unreliable – in 2002 alone, her office found 10,000 possible cases of fraud in EU accounts. The EC says she was disloyal. See here, here, here.

U.S. EPA Declares Carbon Dioxide a Hazard, Paving Way for Rules
By Daniel Whitten  Dec. 7 (Bloomberg)
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency declared carbon dioxide a health hazard today, paving the way for new regulation of emissions from power plants, factories, cars and trucks and other sources.
The decision allows the agency to issue rules to govern heat-trapping pollution that many scientists say may lead to disruptive and irreversible climate shifts. (Here)
[And very many say that is pure nonsense! why? Find out, read this,  ] 

Carbon-Permit Revenue Would Go to U.S. Taxpayers
Dec. 11 (Bloomberg) -- Revenue from selling carbon-dioxide emission permits would be divided among U.S. taxpayers, and Wall Street companies would be barred from trading in carbon markets under legislation proposed today.
The average family of four would get a check for $1,000 from sales of the permits under the measure, known as cap-and- dividend, introduced by U.S. Senators Maria Cantwell, a Washington Democrat, and Susan Collins, a Maine Republican.
The approach would require regulated companies to buy carbon dioxide-emission permits from the government, with 75 percent of the revenue divided among taxpayers and 25 percent going to fund clean-energy research and development, worker transition and energy efficiency.
[...] Cantwell and Collins would limit trading of permits, called carbon shares, to companies required to hold them, such as utilities and oil refineries. Securities firms and hedge funds couldn’t participate, as they could under cap-and-trade legislation passed by the House in June. A similar measure is pending in the Senate.  /here
[So they tax the companies by way of carbon indulgences, the companies raise their selling prices plus some to cover the extra bureaucratic bookwork costs plus some to pay the gov tax on the extra profit. Or go abroad. IT IS A CON. ]

The Inconvenient Truth Behind The Green Agenda; Obama’s Stimulus Bill
November 10th, 2009
In case you haven’t caught on to how Obama’s stimulus plan and Al Gore’s “Green Agenda” is going to work, it’s going to work much like the bank bailout plan worked.
We gave nearly $800 billion dollars of our money to Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, who told us he was going to do one thing, and then did another. Instead of buying up bad mortgages, Hank Paulson just handed our money over to the banks.
And what did the banks do?
Did they reinvest that taxpayer money back into the community to create jobs?
Did they use our money stimulate the economy and consumer spending by making new loans?
No, they did the opposite.
They turned around and hiked interest rates on our credit cards, gouged us with junk fees, and cut off credit to both consumers and small business.
Now let’s take a look at Obama’s Stimulus plan and tell me if you see any similarities. /continues


(Lubos Motl,  referencing a post on AmericanThinker's blog)

A Climatology Conspiracy? (click)
Douglass and Christy knew something about the process of peer review and publishing but the ClimateGate e-mails have expanded their knowledge about the procedures - and especially the behind-the-scenes tricks - by a huge factor. So they could reconstruct the events.
It's just a stunning reading. I would write a similar summary of the corrupt aspects of the process, but let me reproduce theirs instead. Their reconstruction proves
(a) unusual cooperation between authors and editor,
(b) misstatement of known facts,
(c) character assassination,
(d) avoidance of traditional scientific give-and-take,
(e) using confidential information,
(f) misrepresentation (or misunderstanding) of the scientific question posed by DCPS,
(g) withholding data, and more.

[Perhaps the scam is falling apart - I live in hope.]

More bad - er - I mean good - news:
China says Britain sowing discord in climate talks
BEIJING: China condemned claims ascribed to Britain's climate change minister that it had "hijacked" negotiations in Copenhagen, saying on Tuesday the accusations were a scheme to sow discord among developing countries.
The sharp words from Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu were the latest baring of diplomatic bad blood after the talks in Copenhagen ended on Saturday with a broad, non-binding accord that fell short of hopes for a robust global agreement on how to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
Jiang was responding to a report in Britain's Guardian newspaper that said the Environment Minister Ed Miliband had accused China, Sudan, Bolivia and other left-wing Latin American nations of thwarting efforts to reach deeper agreement on how to fight global warming.
In a separate commentary for the paper, Miliband said China had "vetoed" a widely supported proposal at the Copenhagen talks to aim to cut global greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent by 2050.
The spokeswoman Jiang did not criticise Miliband by name, but China's ire was clear./full tale

Carbon Prices Tumble After ‘Modest’ Climate Deal (Update2)
By Mathew Carr and Ewa Krukowska
Dec. 21 (Bloomberg) -- European and United Nations carbon prices fell the most since February after the Copenhagen climate accord didn’t set targets that would boost demand for permits.
European Union carbon-dioxide allowances for delivery in December 2010 declined 8.3 percent to close at 12.45 euros ($17.82) on the European Climate Exchange in London. Today was the first day of trading since the summit concluded Dec. 19./more

Model products that are the sum of the IPCC's evidence for AGW and the entire reason for their continued highly damaging and expensive, futile existence (except for their value to UNEP (CoR etc.) in advancing the EU-UN's world gov by stealth ambition) should be treated as horoscopes.

Climategate: The Perils of Global Warming Models
[...] The discipline differs from many other technical professions in that programmers generally do not need to be licensed or pass any standardized (or governmentally regulated) certification tests in order to call themselves “programmers” or even “software engineers.”
After describing the failings of models, the article concludes;
Because of their inherent limitations (which I’ve just touched on here) all computer models should be treated with a very healthy degree of skepticism.
To insure appropriate integrity, all computer models regarding matters of importance should be subjected to the rigors of scientific methodology.
If they can’t accurately and continuously replicate the results of real-world data, then they should be discarded.
Unfortunately, that is not what is happening.
We have gotten so addicted to the illusion that these programs are accurate — and some have become so agenda driven — that we are now adjusting or discarding real-world data that doesn’t agree with the model. This is insane.
If a model has not been proven to fully reflect reality, then it has very limited use and should be treated with the same degree of consideration that one might give a horoscope.

My opinion, Merriam Webster defines Science:
1 : the state of knowing : knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding
2 a : a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study "the science of theology" 
2b : something (as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned like systematized knowledge "have it down to a science"
3 a : knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method
3b : such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena : NATURAL SCIENCE
4 : a system or method reconciling practical ends with scientific laws "culinary science"

Modelling fails every definition of science. We are being conned by the IPCC with the equivalent of horoscopes produced by faith, guesswork and deception by uncertified, unlicensed programmers.

I haven't included Warwick Hughes' excellent reportage for a while, I guess the way to remedy that is to link to his recent posts. He has a really good, well informed take on the duplicitous maligning of CO2, political as well as scientific. His Critical Examination of Climate Change especially is a worthwhile read.

2009 update – Perth dam catchments rainfall still normal, Govt building $Billion seawater desalination plant #2
December 21st, 2009 by Warwick Hughes
As this graphic continues to show – year after year, Perth dam catchments rainfall has proved remarkably reliable over 35 years in the face of recent WA Govt propaganda spruiking, “our drying climate”, etc etc. See my late 2007 article,
“There never was a rain shortage to justify seawater desalination for Perth’s water supply”
and downloadable word doc with several rational proposals vastly cheaper and lower impact than seawater desalination to augment Perth water supply.
35 years Perth dams catchments rain
But the silly WA Govt are going ahead with the plus $Billion new desal plant at Binningup just north of Bunbury.
Disgraceful waste of taxpayer monies, exactly at a time we are entering economic rough times. Crazy. See the full page press advert your taxes paid for;
Read my July 2007;
W.A. Govt propaganda takes water supply “post rain”
and in May 2007;
West Australian Premier talks utter nonsense about rainfall
What was it he said – from Hansard;
Mr A.J. CARPENTER (WA Premier): “..It has stopped raining in the south west of Western Australia. The rain no longer falls from the sky in sufficient quantities to fill the dams to fill the pipes to fill the cups for people to drink…”
Clearly, politicians fed climate change rubbish from the ruling public service elite are believing their own incestuous propaganda.
All rain data from the Australian BoM – who else.

Russians now saying what I have said for years
December 17th, 2009 by Warwick Hughes
This digest of Russian media carries a story that the Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) issued a report claiming that the Hadley Center for Climate Change based at the headquarters of the British Meteorological Office in Exeter (Devon, England) had probably tampered with Russian-climate data.
IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect more frequently than the correct data of remote stations.
My report “USSR High Magnitude Climate Warming Anomalies 1901-1996″ – shows example after example of what the Russians are talking about.
Climategate is indeed changing our world.
For longer text of Russian article.

US DoE puts “litigation hold” notice on all CRU / Jones data – yet Jones is not obligated to provide data to DoE – go figure
December 16th, 2009 by Warwick Hughes
Over at the pionerering Anthony Watts blog, they have broken this great story about an email notice sent to employees at the – DOE-SR (Department of Energy Savannah River) a site to do with nuclear matters – the notice asks people in much legal terminology to hold on to, not destroy – any material or data to do with CRU at U of East Anglia or global warming etc
As I wrtite there have been 409 comments to the Watts thread and it puzzles me that there is no mention of the department of the DoE where Prof Phil Jones has enjoyed contract support for over 25 years.
That Dept is CDIAC (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center)- and in 1986 they published the documentation books that should be read and understood by anybody reading the Jones et al 1986 journal papers that effectively birthed IPCC global warming.
Now I have no idea if a similar litigation hold notice is effective at CDIAC – but it would be mighty odd if it were not – seeing that Jones work has all been published by CDIAC who to this day publish on their web pages various Jones et al / CRU data and papers.
While we are mentioning “odd”.
In Oct 2005 I wrote to DoE CDIAC asking for the Jones et al / CRU station data and was told, “.. Phil was not obligated under the conditions of past or present DOE proposal awards to provide these items to CDIAC. I regret we cannot furnish the materials you seek.”

Some rare balance on the taxpayer funded ABC for a change
December 11th, 2009 by Warwick Hughes
Article by Alan Moran pointing out that the behaviour of pro IPCC scientists as revealed in the Climategate emails, is nothing new. There is much to tell about the BoM of the early 1990’s.
The Balling, Idso and Hughes. 1992 paper “Long-Term and Recent Anomalous Temperature Changes in Australia.” – referred to in the ABC article is now scanned online.
Timeline of AGW research from two decades ago

Chatter about six months of heat downunder but no official BoM Media Release
December 10th, 2009 by Warwick Hughes
Those of us in the wide brown land get accustomed to the media blitz about hottest ever this or that period. I see our Minister Wong while away in Copenhagen even joins in. Look for her third segment.
“We know that we’re at the end of what looks like the hottest decade that the world has seen or recorded. Australia’s had its third hottest year in history since measurement began.”

Wattsup with Darwin Zero
December 9th, 2009 by Warwick Hughes
Many of us have seen the article by Willis Eschenbach over at the Anthony Watts site, “Smoking gun at Darwin Zero” (SGDZ) . I disagree with Willis that the strongly warming GHCN Darwin 0 data has been used by CRU.
Fig 1 in SGDZ shows a small IPCC diagram with a sketch temperature trend for Northern Australia for the period 1900’s to 2000. Willis found that the GHCN adjusted Zero version for Darwin warmed very strongly post 1940, see his Fig 8.
That trend in Fig 1 looks to me to agree with the land only CRUT3 trend that anyone can generate for that Northern Australia region using the useful KNMI Climate Explorer page which lets you interrogate many monthly global databases – enter link on right to Monthly observations. Downloading CRUT3 and NCDC GHCN for the period 1907-2000 I get trends over the 94 years of 0.48 for CRUT3 and 0.87 for NCDC GHCN. Following four graphics all from KNMI Climate Explorer
IPCC Northern Australia region – trend for CRUT3
IPCC Northern Australia region – trend for NCDC GHCN
Darwin grid cell – trend for CRUT3 (I think they are wrong to join Darwin Post Office to Aiport like that) No sign of Darwin Zero here.
Darwin CRUT3
Darwin grid cell – trend for NCDC GHCN
Darwin GHCN
To wrap up this section re Darwin Zero, I am saying the GHCN Darwin Zero data is not used in CRUT3. What a shambles the global T datasets are.

Avoid the deceptive Google – Copenhagen voting page
December 6th, 2009 by Warwick Hughes
Google has set up this site
Avoid it, there is no opportunity to register a vote sceptical of the IPCC process. Once you click on the “Submit” button you have voted for the IPCC. Can some IT guru set up a page where sceptics can vote no to the entire IPCC process ? Thanks

Greens go nowhere as Liberals win Australian federal byelections in Bradfield and Higgins
December 5th, 2009 by Warwick Hughes
For overseas readers the Australian Liberal party is right wing – (unlike your small “l” liberals in the USA). The Libs form our Federal opposition with the smaller even more right wing rural based National Party. The left wing Australian Labor Party forms the Federal Govt now under Prime Mimister Kevin Rudd after elections in 2007.

Global cooling in 1976 – deja vu all over again
December 5th, 2009 by Warwick Hughes
Alan Wilkie – well known TV weatherman on the Australian Channel 7 of a few decades ago. Enjoy the four scanned pages from his 1976 book describing global cooling and the associated bad effects breaking out here and there around the globe.
These days we are constantly badgered by utter twaddle about “global warming”. I am interested to hear readers views on what a “mainstream” informed person was saying three and a half decades ago. (Edited 6 Dec)

Our Changing Weather Patterns
Page 47
Page 48
Ice Ages
Page 50
Page 51
My reason for posting this just now is the fascinating 1974 CIA article uncovered by Maurizio Morabito.
The alarm bells have been sounding for a decade at least.
* CoR CoB CoM links via Yahoo and Gore's alarmist gorgle.
CoR, CoB, CoM,
CoR, CoB, CoM,
If you ignore the twaddle about the Mayan calendar, Fintan gives some good info. here:
Illuminati via Yahoodle
New World Order (single world gov - EU+UN) viaYahoodle also

No comments:

Post a Comment