TOTAL EMISSIVITY OF A MIXTURE OF GASES CONTAINING 5% OF WATER VAPOR AND 0.039% OF CARBON DIOXIDE, AND THE TOTAL EMISSIVITY OF THE CARBON DIOXIDE ON MARS ATMOSPHERE AND ITS EFFECT ON THE TEMPERATURE OF MARS’ ATMOSPHERE.
This magnitude of total normal irradiance from the surface is 2 times higher than the total normal irradiance from the atmosphere (which is 111.5 W/m^2 sr); therefore, the concept of photon stream and induced emission prevails in this case eliminating the speculation of a down-welling radiation that hypothetically warms up the surface. Such is an idea that is absolutely opposed to the second law of thermodynamics. (Reference 4)
The change of temperature caused by the energy absorbed by the surface is 6 K. The error margin is ±0.4 K. Therefore, the change of temperature of the atmosphere caused by the intensity of the irradiance emitted from the surface to the air is 1.94 ±0.4 K.
Given the emissivity of the soil (0.82) (references 1 and 5) compared with the emissivity of the carbon dioxide (0.0017), the load of energy from the surface to the space capable of causing induced emission from the mass of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 53 W/m^2 sr; in contrast, the load of energy emitted by the carbon dioxide to all directions gives a total of 0.28 W/m^2 sr, at all wavelengths corresponding to the spectral emission of carbon dioxide at all bands. (Reference 3)
As a result, the fraction of photons in the photon stream formed from the surface to the space, which is able of causing induced emission, overwhelms the irradiance of energy by the carbon dioxide towards all directions (isotropic) by a percentage of 99%.
Are the proponents of the anthropogenic global warming expecting that physicists believe in the down-welling fallacy?
Full article from here: climaterealists.com/index.php?id=6013